What would you say if I said there is a 501 (c ) (3) non-profit whose sole mission is to silence the opposition’s lawyers before they even make it to the courtroom? Now granted, that isn’t how they present it. It is how I present it, in my humble opinion kind of way.
They say it like this:
“We’re leading the fight to defend our democracy by creating a system of accountability for lawyers who have brought or may seek in the future to bring meritless lawsuits to overturn legitimate elections results.”
Did a chill run down your spine?
I don’t know about you, but when I read the above quote, I hear the chanting of the left, the mantra, if you will – Save Our Democracy! It is like a bad song in my head, a droning, hypnotic chorus of leftist propaganda.
And the sheeple donate.
How is their desire to influence the legal process ‘defending our democracy?’ I know what their answer would be. They would say the strategy of filing ethics complaints against political opposition is their prerogative, and is part of the political and legal process should they choose to make it so.
How disingenuous! It is thuggery, pure, and simple.
Their quote states they have established “a system of accountability for lawyers.” Where is the accountability system for those preempting the legal process and attempting to suppress information, opinion, and public discourse?
65 Project says they are fighting ‘meritless lawsuits.’ The assumption here is that they, Project 65, are the royal arbiters of what is ‘meritless.’
What can go wrong with that?
They remind me of the unelected deep-state bureaucrats. I have flashes of McCabe, Paige, Comey, Clapper, and Brennan dancing to the chant of Save Our Democracy and RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA – the now debunked Russia Russia Russia, that is.
Nevertheless, they still haven’t learned that a vast number of American people are on to them and their daily, forever heating up, anti-American warfare. Well, maybe some have learned, but none of them give a damn if we know or if we don’t. They continue relentlessly disrespecting our laws and processes and giving us BS in the political arena.
It is always the same old tune from the left and it is disrespectful of our heritage, our beliefs, and our election process.
What they deem ‘meritless’ is clearly defined by their actions. If it involves Trump and the election, it must be meritless, fraudulent, and an attempt to undermine American democracy. (There’s that propaganda chant again, that chant of projection.)
How do our ‘judicial authorities’ know the ‘merits’ if the court never hears the argument?
How is working to ensure election integrity of past and future elections considered an attempt to undermine American democracy?
Their threatening ways are designed to silence, disengage, demoralize, and slander the opposition into submission, of course. Just like a good, little red book-reading commie would do.
You will be quiet. You will submit. Or we will just have to silence you.
Look, I am no rocket scientist, but you don’t need to be one to know the election was not legit. You don’t need much in the way of discernment skills, either.
It is as easy to see as a grown elephant stuck in a shallow quarry.
Between June 2020 and November 2020, Trump held over 65 rallies with tens of thousands regularly in attendance. (Per Parscales statistical reports, on average, 23% of Trump rally attendees were Democrats. That is an interesting little tidbit, especially for the Democrats in attendance because it is not totally inconceivable that their votes, were they for Trump, didn’t count.)
I could contrast Trump’s rallies with Biden’s circled twelve attendees, but that would not be in conformance with the sacrosanct ESG. There flat-out is no equality in that comparison.
At Biden’s small meetings, I mean rallies, do you remember those large circles on the floor, one for each supporter of the ten or twelve to stand or sit in? Each circle was supposedly calculated to be at least six feet from the other. That was the kind of scene they should never have wanted to be aired.
Biden’s headcount was so low that you could not define it as an ‘audience.’ It was more like the building’s maintenance folks showed up to change the air-conditioning filters.
In Biden’s defense, his campaign presented that he was worried about Covid and, therefore, unwilling to hold larger rallies – at least, that was the interpretation from the good soldier press.
Imagine that! So many people voting for a candidate who was running on the fear ticket from the basement in Delaware!
People don’t voluntarily vote for a fear candidate unless they are hypnotized or masochistic. Biden didn’t have to go on any campaign trail, and he knew it.
I am not here to present the many ways cheating could have occurred in 2020, like voting machine problems, poll employee problems, a State Supreme Court deciding what only the state’s electorate was authorized to decide, a palate of completed ballots from New York conveniently lost somewhere in Pennsylvania, more votes than voters, dead people on the voter lists, problems with the dates on ballots, mismatched signatures, fraud in nursing homes, the videos of ballot harvesters, the endlessly arriving ballots in the dark late of night, the online activity during election night… I am not going to address any of that.
I will discuss the willful plot to intimidate political opposition and alter the normal legal process with thuggery. Their intent here is to suppress the discovery and the extent of past election tampering and ensure future elections can be rigged with less confrontation.
To be clear, it is called intimidation, and it is a communist tactic.
One or two verbally over-the-top lawyers, maybe three, is believable. But seventy-six lawyers in need of stern reprimands or more? That is nothing other than more witch hunts.
They were so gobsmacked when Hillary lost that they, well, I’ll let Joe Biden tell you:
“Secondly, we are in a situation where we have put together — and you guys di di di did this for our, for President Obama’s administration before this, we have put together the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of America.”
There you have it. Ja Ja Ja Joe wasn’t reading the teleprompter.
Lest I be charged with jumping to conclusions, let me provide more information about this tax-exempt’s repetitive and transparent strategy directly from their website. You can judge for yourself.
Per their website, as of 6/17/2023, the 65 Project had filed ethics complaints against 76 individual attorneys. Below is a list of names as identified on www.the65project.com.
Peruse it. You will find some names that are familiar and names of those in positions of authority, elected officials, in fact, who were elected to represent their constituents.
No matter – they needed to be dealt with.
Ethics complaints filed per the Project 65 Website
- Kurt B. Olsen
- Stefan Passantino
- Kurt Hilbert
- Ray Smith III
- Harry MacDougald
- Andrew D. Parker
- Jesse H. Kibort
- Joseph A. Pull
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jesse R. Binnall
- Shana D. Weir
- Gregory M. Erickson
- Erick G. Kaardal
- Alexander Kolodin
- William F. Morhman
- Lee Miller
- David W. Spilsbury
- Christopher Viskovic
- Dennis I. Wilenchik
- John D. Wilenchik
- Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch
- Alabama Attorney General Steven Marshall
- West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrissey
- Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge
- Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt
- Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmidt
- Former Montana Attorney General Tim Fox
- Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes
- Former Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery
- Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landy
- Former Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill
- Oklahoma Attorney General Mike Hunter
- Nebraska Attorney General Douglas Peterson
- Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody
- South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson
- Kevin Koons
- William Bock
- Jeffrey Gallant
- Daniel Eastman
- Michael Dean
- Robert Citak
- James Knauer
- Emily Newman
- Richard Coleson
- Courtney Milbank
- Howard Kleinhendler
- Brandon Johnson
- Melana Siebert
- Julia Haler
- James Bopp
- Kurt Olsen
- William Olson
- John Eastman
- Kenneth Klukowski
- Kenneth Chesbro
- Trump Attorney Jenna Ellis
- Linda Kerns
- Bruce Marks
- James Bopp
- Ronald Hicks
- Carolyn McGee
- Anita Milanovich
- Marc Scaringi
- Brian Caffrey
- Walter Zimolong
- Senator Ted Cruz
- False Elector William Carver
- William Calhoun
- Trump Attorney Cleta Mitchell
- Trump Attorney Joseph diGenova
- Trump Attorney Boris Epshteyn
- Vexatious Attorney Paul Davis
- Insurrectionist Attorney William Calhoun
- False Elector Daryl Moody
- False Elector Andrew Hitt
- Trump Attorney James Troupis
You can read the filings in all cases on their site, I believe, except for Ted Cruz’s. As of today, when you click on the ethics complaint against Cruz, the link takes you to the ethics complaint filed against Alan Dershowitz. If you go to Raw Story or USA Today, their links for Cruz also go to Dershowitz’s ethics complaint.
Also from their website:
“The 65 Project will work to hold accountable the lawyers who raise fraudulent claims to overturn legitimate elections results while also creating a rule-based system to prevent future attempts and to strengthen the mechanisms for accountability and deterrence.”
If they were, in fact, fraudulent claims, why not wait for the legal process to figure that out, come to its own conclusion, and deal with the offending attorneys directly?
Why? Because they couldn’t risk depending on a judicial system they do not fully control – yet.
They had to take action.
They opted, likely after observing the ethics complaints filed against Rudy Guiliani and Sidney Powell, to influence the process with a massive number of ethics complaint filings, at least 76 of them in less than 12 months, from March 7, 2022, to February 15th, 2023.
In my opinion, this is the political strategy of goons, rats, and thugs.
If 76 attorneys, including 15 past or current attorney generals, believed election results were conceivably inaccurate, there is a darn good reason why and any ethics review body ought to be smart enough to realize it.
Or are they threatened by thuggery, too? Or perhaps something even more nefarious?
But 76 complaint filings won’t be the end of it. Thugs with communist tendencies never stop. They simply adapt.
These are leftist and political ambulance chasers scouring the country for more ethics complaint opportunities. If they can’t find them, they will imagine them or ‘create them’ as they like to say.
At some point, they will come up with a new Project, a new strategy, but it will be the same tired old witch hunt.
And the sheeple believe.
“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!”
Isaiah 5:20 (NIV)
© copyrighted June 2023
*****************
65 Project – InfluenceWatch – InfluenceWatch
Group: Texas bar should discipline Ted Cruz for 2020 election conduct (usatoday.com)
Judge tosses attorney ethics case against Trump ally Sidney Powell | Reuters
Group that tried to disbar Ted Cruz over 2020 wants ban on election lies by lawyers (dallasnews.com)
100 Percent Voter Turnout: Massive Nursing Home Election Fraud | Facts Matter (theepochtimes.com)